metasens

The following methods are implemented to evaluate how sensitive the results of a meta-analysis are to potential bias in meta-analysis and to support Schwarzer et al. (2015) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0, Chapter 5 'Small-Study Effects in Meta-Analysis': - Copas selection model described in Copas & Shi (2001) doi:10.1177/096228020101000402; - limit meta-analysis by Rücker et al. (2011) doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxq046; - upper bound for outcome reporting bias by Copas & Jackson (2004) doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00161.x; - imputation methods for missing binary data by Gamble & Hollis (2005) doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.013 and Higgins et al. (2008) doi:10.1177/1740774508091600; - LFK index test and Doi plot by Furuya-Kanamori et al. (2018) doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141.

Last 30 days

The following line graph shows the downloads per day. You can hover over the graph to see the exact number of downloads per day.

Last 365 days

The following line graph shows the downloads per day. You can hover over the graph to see the exact number of downloads per day.